"You lose time ... to save time ... spend less time ...". How many times during the last lesson of computer science prof. has given similar sentences? I do not know, after a while I lost count. Apparently communication is adapting to what characterizes the search for more information from the user, that is the rush of it. Obviously, the web and on-line newspapers are among the first to adapt by cutting all that would take you too long to read and the reporter too long to write more and more synthetic securities, eyelet virtually disappeared, short articles, as some longer have the copy-paste the agency deleted the videos that take too much to load, images that speak for themselves so you avoid having to accompany a text, sites with as much information as possible in stacked one next to 'other. Lots of news then, but how are they treated? We'll get to the point where
count plus the amount of quality? O now we have already?
It fits perfectly in this context, the site
Italianews , created by a consortium of magazines to local newspapers in each region. Virtually the newspapers that subscribe to them, while maintaining their personal website with news of their area, go to this site also their main news. The idea seems good, basically you can not get the idea of \u200b\u200ba national newspaper made with pieces of the various regions and provide users with news not only of their city but also those further afield. But what is so special? Those involved in putting together the pieces? The computer itself, or through special aggregators around the web browsing and searches of news read more about all the other sites. Virtually does it all: read the whole network, select what they want and copy it into your page. Again a great time-saver for us that we should not make the effort to go at each paper (but not really we have more to lose even a few minutes?) and for those who create the news that in this case delegated the job to the PC. But in this way
who controls the quality of what is being provided?
"You lose time ... to save time ... spend less time ...". How many times during the last lesson of computer science prof. has given similar sentences? I do not know, after a while I lost count. Apparently communication is adapting to what characterizes the search for more information from the user, that is the rush of it. Obviously, the web and on-line newspapers are among the first to adapt by cutting all that would take you too long to read and the reporter too long to write more and more synthetic securities, eyelet virtually disappeared, short articles, as some longer have the copy-paste the agency deleted the videos that take too much to load, images that speak for themselves so you avoid having to accompany a text, sites with as much information as possible in stacked one next to 'other. Lots of news then, but how are they treated? We'll get to the point where count plus the amount of quality? O now we have already? 
It fits perfectly in this context, the site Italianews , created by a consortium of magazines to local newspapers in each region. Virtually the newspapers that subscribe to them, while maintaining their personal website with news of their area, go to this site also their main news. The idea seems good, basically you can not get the idea of \u200b\u200ba national newspaper made with pieces of the various regions and provide users with news not only of their city but also those further afield. But what is so special? Those involved in putting together the pieces? The computer itself, or through special aggregators around the web browsing and searches of news read more about all the other sites. Virtually does it all: read the whole network, select what they want and copy it into your page. Again a great time-saver for us that we should not make the effort to go at each paper (but not really we have more to lose even a few minutes?) and for those who create the news that in this case delegated the job to the PC. But in this way who controls the quality of what is being provided? 
0 comments:
Post a Comment