Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Kerastase Amineksil Fiyat Listesi

Privacy Web

Talking about issues such as privacy, Facebook and the new French organization Hadopi, today on the Republic's blog appears Zambardino Vittorio 's interview Francesco Pizzetti, president of the guarantor of the data personal. Council reading in its entirety so do not carry specific lengths, but a quick quote:
"is more dangerous than what Google knows me or knows what my next door neighbor to me via Google?"

Just a few posts ago I was wondering if we still have the privacy or if we are losing without realizing it ...

Thursday, May 21, 2009

No Prior Installation Of Rome Total War

Perhaps one last hope

does not stop there. The French do not fit. A little more than a week after the approval of law against online piracy , the socialist deputies have submitted appeal to the Constitutional Court for annulment of the law. The latter tries to protect the copyright material on the Internet by punishing offenders who dump illegally, warning them first with mail and registered mail, then removing them connect to the network. Small detail: they must continue to pay the same subscription.
While initially deployed as opposed to the French parliamentary sanctions against the pirates of the network, however, were cast in favor of a "creative contribution to finance subscriptions Internet copyright", now you are the spokesman for all users Web and railed against the text of the law, identifying the most controversial points .
In discussion, in particular, the provision that, if a person blamed challenges the claim of infringement of the law because his connection was to use someone else, perhaps a family, must find a way to defend showing that he had taken all the necessary measures to secure your Internet connection. MEPs believe that this contravenes the 'Article 9 the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen , which establishes the principle of presumption of innocence.
also apparently the penalty under that law conflicts with an amendment recently approved by the European Parliament in which it is determined that the Internet is an element of the manifestation of freedom of thought and can not be done in any way a sanction of law. But what is even most important, it is stated that the connection is a right that can be revoked only through a measure of the judiciary, and the French new directive would entrust this task to an administrative authority established for this purpose.
The Constitutional Court therefore has a month to consider all points of the application and d express their opinion. In essence, the debate is still open: the vexed question of who sees first manufacturers who trade CDs and DVDs to other prices and other users too hence free download from the web violating copyright is not yet fully completed. If you will be given final approval to the new law Sarkozy's many downloads will no longer be possible and users of the network will revolutionize the way they use the web and find alternative routes. The problem is likely to expand soon to nationals of all other European nations, because the solution adopted by France has been observed with interest by the governments of other countries who are preparing to do the same.
Internet users in the meantime the community is already planning to circumvent the decision through the advice of forum created to help the ordinary citizen to divert the norm, obviously in an illegal manner as before.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Doll Houses From The 80s

We still have the privacy? There is no time

Apparently Google has invented a algorithm that allows corporate executives to be able know in advance which employees are unhappy or are considering changing jobs. This tells us what is now a Republic of article about new technologies.
The news will certainly please the great managers that may well be able to take precautions to avoid loss of valuable work, but what are the advantages for employees? That will no longer have the freedom to look for another job without your boss it learns, attached with all the reasons? It is not considered a f footprint of a breach of privacy ? But above all, we can no longer even have the freedom to formulate a thought negative personal or otherwise with respect to the business we work without a guarantee that those who are above us did not come to know and prepare any repercussions? Yes, because apparently this new tool even allows you to enter into the thoughts of people and detect their level of dissatisfaction. Allow me to bring back the phrases in my opinion the most important part:
"Our algorithm allows us to enter in the minds of employees even before they know they wanted to leave, "said Laszlo Bock, Google's director of human resources.
" The algorithm is able to identify the discontent even before it materializes clearly in mind the employee ".
At present, this futuristic invention is not yet on the market, Google rightly and cleverly may want to keep it all for themselves to avoid competition, but in the case to become available to everyone as it will change the lives of employees? may still express their grievances freely browse without someone in their thoughts in search of what may be annoying to superiors? will still be able to have the freedom to do an interview in another position if they are not satisfied with the current and prevent the rest of know? Will still be able to choose another job without being prevented from doing so?
were not enough cameras in every place where we go and every corner of the street, free Internet, but that seems to actually record our every move on the sites we visit, all cards that require us to do to access many services and personal data that we are practically forced to leave whenever we want to use them, have now also found a way to control our thoughts even before they can think for ourselves ... We're not exaggerating a bit?